Friday, December 5, 2008

Saving Our Nation's Atlantic Salmon


Atlantic salmon fry, Mill Brook, Presumpscot River, Upper Methodist Road, Westbrook, Maine, June 5, 2005. Photo by Douglas Watts, Friends of Sebago Lake.
---
Maine Governor John Baldacci and the State of Maine oppose saving the last Atlantic salmon left in the United States.

These Maine citizens support saving Atlantic salmon:

Comments of Friends of Sebago Lake.
Comments of Douglas H. Watts.
Comments of Friends of Merrymeeting Bay.
Comments of Trout Unlimited.
Comments of Natural Resources Council of Maine.
Comments of Ed Baum, former Senior Scientist, Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

10-20-08 I am not kidding when I say that the Maeitta Pit is close to Haydn
Fen and Sebago Lake.

Sebago Lake vegetable soup

October 20, 2008 This is what the green algae in Haydn Fen looks like from a canoe.
No wonder it is so distinctive from several hundred feet above in a helicopter.

Sebago lake's Haydn Fen Green Algae

This is an Oct, 20, 2008 aerial of Haydn Bog. Those various shades of green in the water is algae and this is something new. What is happening to this important wetland of Sebago Lake? All this scummy algae flushes out of the fen when it floods. Some of the algae mats are distributed along the shores of Sebago Lake depending which way the wind blows. Two factors have changed for Haydn Fen. One is the wetland never dries out anymore. The natural seasonal fluctuation and natural range of Sebago Lake is gone thanks to the ignorance of those that control Sebago Lake. The second factor is the Maeitta gravel mine just above Haydn Fen.
This massive earthen pit has forever disrupted the natural flow of water into Haydn Bog. Who were those Maine legislature politicians that promoted such devastation.

Songo River Delta


On October 20, 2008 A Point of View Helicopter was circling Sebago Lake. The water level was
263 msl. Over 100 photos on a perfect day. The focus of the flight was to photographically document the lake wetlands. One conclusion that stands out is how significantly the wetlands have been altered by the new water level regulation regime.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

George Smith: Manure Merchant

To the Editor, Kennebec Journal, Oct. 2, 2008:

The amount of manure that George Smith is able to stuff into one column never ceases to amaze me. His diatribe on listing the Atlantic salmon as an endangered species (Sept. 24) is rife with misinformation and employs his usual scare tactics to inflame an uneducated public.

Had Angus King succeeded in preventing the listing of the Atlantic salmon, he would have been the one individual most responsible for their demise in the U.S. Thankfully, the federal government did the right thing by giving the salmon protection and it is now proposing to finish the job by protecting salmon in the Androscoggin, Kennebec and Penobscot rivers.

Claims by Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins that "state restorative efforts" can best increase salmon populations are a joke.

Maine doesn't even have the resources to keep its residents warm in the winter.

It was on the state's watch that salmon were nearly wiped out, thanks to inadequate controls on timber harvesting, agriculture and aquaculture, which all combined to damage and destroy salmon and their habitat.

Atlantic salmon are coming back. In the Sandy River, they're reproducing again for the first time in more than 150 years -- and their offspring are also returning to spawn. The potential for Atlantic salmon restoration and the resulting environmental, economic and social benefits, especially in the Kennebec River drainage, is enormous. Federal protection and funding, however, are needed if this potential is ever to be realized.

John M. Glowa Sr.
South China, Maine

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Why Atlantic Salmon are Important
















Bill Townsend says:


This column is a response to George Smith's recent column about the proposed Endangered Species Act listing for Atlantic salmon in the Penobscot, Kennebec and Androscoggin rivers (Sept. 24).

Atlantic salmon are a native species, so numerous when the first European settlers arrived in New England four centuries ago as to boggle their minds. Historical records show runs of hundreds of thousands of these fish in Maine's rivers.

Overfishing, pollution and dam construction without fish passage reduced this incredible resource to runs in a few rivers in Washington County by the middle of the 20th century.

The state of Maine recognized in 1947 that it would be unconscionable to allow the last remaining Atlantic salmon in the United States to join the passenger pigeon and the American bison in the ranks of once-great populations of wildlife destroyed by human greed.

In a poignant report, a special gubernatorial commission urged the state to take immediate action to protect Atlantic salmon.

The Legislature created the Atlantic Sea Run Salmon Commission in 1948, merged into the Department of Marine Resources as the Bureau of Sea Run Fisheries and Habitat in 2007. The agency has done yeoman work under the leadership of Horace Bond, Al Meister, Ed Baum and now Pat Keliher to protect Atlantic salmon in Maine.

In 1967, enactment of the federal Anadromous Fisheries Restoration Act led to the federal program to restore Atlantic salmon in much of its former habitat. The Penobscot River was chosen as the flagship for restoration.

That program continues today. The results have often been discouraging. Restoring a natural resource which has been destroyed is a difficult job.

But it is necessary, because how we treat the other species that share the planet with us is a measure of our humanity. Just like eagles and grizzly bears, we are restoring Atlantic salmon for their own sake, not merely to satisfy anglers.

Because they are born in fresh water, migrate to sea and return as adults to reproduce, the complex life cycle of Atlantic salmon makes them difficult to manage. In fresh water, dams, pollution and poaching take their toll. In the ocean, it has taken two decades of international negotiation to control commercial fishing of Atlantic salmon.

Yet bit by painful bit, there is progress. The plan to remove two dams on the Penobscot River is a case in point. No one should expect the legacy of centuries of environmental harm to be reversed overnight. But something worth doing must be done well, and doing it well takes time, energy and commitment.

There is real cause for hope. In 2008, returns of Atlantic salmon to the rivers of Maine, and around the North Atlantic, showed a significant increase over recent years. More than 2,000 fish returned to the Penobscot, more than double the average of the preceding five years. Whether this is the beginning of a trend, only time will tell. But despite the nay-sayers, short-term considerations cannot override the principles evoked in the 1947 report.

The Atlantic salmon is a species in deep trouble. Through the medium of the Endangered Species Act, the United States has established a mechanism for addressing the needs of species in trouble. The Act has been profoundly beneficial in its nearly 40 years of existence. In spite of the dire predictions made when Atlantic salmon were listed as endangered in Washington County, there has been no detriment to the economy of that region arising from the listing.

An Endangered Species Act listing of Atlantic salmon in the Penobscot, Kennebec and Androscoggin rivers will not bring the economic doom that George Smith has predicted. It will enable fishery managers to bring about the changes that are necessary for a healthy eco-system in which Atlantic salmon, other fish, birds, mammals and human beings alike can all thrive.

Clinton B. Townsend is a Skowhegan attorney and president of Maine Rivers. He was appointed by President George H.W. Bush as a U.S. commissioner to the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization, where he served from 1990-94. He is vice chairman and secretary of the Atlantic Salmon Federation and a past president of the Maine Council of the Atlantic Salmon Federation.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Come hear FOSL !!!

Thursday October 2nd kicks off the 12th annual Speaker Series season of Friends of Merrymeeting Bay. Join Doug Watts of Friends of Sebago Lake discussing the new federal proposals to expand the endangered species listing for Atlantic salmon in Maine. Find out why protecting Atlantic salmon helps protect all of our migratory fish and how you can comment on both proposals in a timely fashion. Doug's presentation begins at 7pm in the Morrill Meeting Room of the Brunswick Public Library.

Cheers.

Monday, August 25, 2008

USGS on water level impact

This was from USGS Great Lakes Science Center Website. USGS thinks water level is important to consider. Wish they would look at Maine Lakes like Sebago Lake and China Lake.

Terrestrial, Freshwater, and Marine Ecosystems

Drowned River Mouth Wetland Coastal Ecosystems

The coastal zone of the Great Lakes (defined here as those onshore and nearshore areas that are or were at one time influenced by coastal and aeolian processes) includes wetlands, drowned river mouths, shallow water habitats, oak savannas, beaches, dunes, relict coastal features and deposits, and abandoned dune fields. These coastal ecosystems offer diverse habitats that support a myriad of plant, fish, and wildlife species. The economy of many coastal areas is dependent on the recreational value of these habitats and the sport fishing, commercial fishing, hunting, birdwatching, and swimming and hiking activities associated with them. Large numbers of seasonal tourists spend millions of dollars on lodging, food, sporting goods, boat and vehicle rentals, gasoline, and personal items, which often represent the major source of income to coastal communities. The ecosystems that supply the fish, wildlife, and recreational facilities underlying that economy have been severely impacted in number, area, and quality. Degradation is often associated with human activity in the coastal zone, including industrial, commercial, residential, and agricultural development, as well as alteration of littoral and other coastal processes that supply the sediments that form and maintain natural features such as dunes, beaches, and sand spits. Yet, surprisingly little is known about the relationships between protection of natural habitat and biota and environmental factors such as water-level change, coastal sediment dynamics, coastal tributary sediment dynamics and hydrology, and ground-water contributions in the coastal zone. Understanding the interactive role of biology, geology, and hydrology in protection and maintenance of coastal features is critical to the survival of the resources important to the people living in and enjoying the coastal zone.

Jordan Bay update

I visited a camp in Jordan Bay. I had not visited this camp since the 1990s. What a decline in water quality. I could not see the bottom anymore. The rocks were coated in slime and spike rush had overtaken the bottom near shore. The beach for late August was small at two feet below full pond. The camps in this area were old and heavily wooded- no development in 60 years.
Portland Water District data is saying what I am seeing out there about the clarity decline since 1990.
What a shame. Remember Ron Lovaglio, that DOC commissioner who made it sure no State Employee would say anything about his irresponsible highly unnatural lake level plan except him. He needs to go for a swim in some of these places. Since he is a big time regional manager for SAPPI and earns a 6 figure salary plus he can afford something that is not so slimy and has , good beaches. I do not mean to be too hard on Ron after all Gov. Baldacci and his folks have Ron beat. They had a chance to help Sebago in the relicensing and all they wanted to do was make Sebago higher. Baldacci's buddy over at Point Sebago needs that water higher enough to float a boat in and have something
more than ankle deep water to swim in.
It is amazing how the State is delaying the new license. It will be at least 5 years before the State files water quality certification after the 2005 FERC license completion so the license can move forward. The Baldacci administration thinks the marinas have a good point that less water should be run out of the lake during a drought in order to insure the highest lake levels and they need a study to see how low a flow they can run in the Presumpscot before they kill all life.

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Maine Public Radio: Presumpscot Deal is Dead


Keith Shortall on Maine Things Considered on Maine Public Radio, 7/8/08.

Presumpscot Deal is Dead: Portland Press-Herald

The Portland Press-Herald and John Richardson provide a good synopsis:

The leader of the Friends of Sebago Lake, a group that pledged to fight the agreement with Sappi, said the deal's collapse is good news for the river and its fish.

Roger Wheeler said the deal included too many compromises with Sappi.

Forcing the company to install fish passage at Cumberland Mills would compel the company to create fish ladders upstream at a faster pace than the agreement would have, he said. And the agreement would not have allowed salmon and other fish to swim all the way up the river.

"We want to restore the fish all the way up to Sebago Lake. That's the way it should be," he said.

Friends of Sebago Lake was preparing to fight the agreement in court, arguing that it was negotiated in private and would illegally change the terms of federal hydropower licenses. State officials defended the agreement as a legal compromise that would have finally settled the dispute.


Excellent, Smithers, excellent.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Secret Presumpscot Deal is Dead


One year ago this week, the world was told about a "win-win" settlement between South African Pulp & Paper (SAPPI), the State of Maine, Friends of the Presumpscot River and American Rivers, and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife & Service that would "restore" the Presumpscot River.

The reality was not so pleasant as the corporate press releases would have you believe.

What actually happened one year ago is that a multi-billion dollar corporation, SAPPI Inc., announced that it would obey a state fishway law at its non-hydro Presumpscot River dam at Cumberland Mills in Westbrook, Maine if and only if SAPPI was allowed to violate the U.S. Clean Water Act at its five Presumpscot River hydro-electric dams for the next 50 years.

That's right. The State of Maine, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and America's foremost river protection group, American Rivers, and its local partner, Friends of the Presumpscot River, agreed to allow a huge corporation to violate the U.S. Clean Water Act on the Presumpscot River for the next 50 years.

SAPPI's dams violate the U.S. Clean Water Act by impounding and destroying most of the Presumpscot River, making it unlivable for its native Atlantic salmon, and cutting the river off from its source, Sebago Lake.

SAPPI's dams destroy, block and sever the finest Atlantic salmon habitat in the United States: the Sebago, Presumpscot and Crooked River Atlantic salmon watershed.


SAPPI's dams are the only reason the Presumpscot River above Westbrook is now virtually dead to its native fish life.

SAPPI's dams are the only reason Atlantic salmon do not swim from Casco Bay to Sebago Lake each spring, as they have done for the past 10,000 years.

The fake restoration deal is now dead.

SAPPI has apparently decided the cost of removing the Cumberland Mills Dam is not worth millions of dollars in federal license givebacks offered by the State of Maine, Friends of the Presumpscot River and American Rivers.

SAPPI's decision seems to make no sense because the cost of complying with Maine's fishway law at the Cumberland Mills Dam will cost as much -- or more -- as removing the dam.

Prior to last July, SAPPI repeatedly told the world that building a fishway at its minuscule Cumberland Mills Dam would put its Westbrook paper mill out of business.

Then, last year, SAPPI abruptly announced that it was willing to spend the same amount of money as a fishway to remove the entire dam.

Suddenly, a mill-killing expense became a mill-saving opportunity !!!

Now, a year later, not so much.

To prevent yourself from getting any more whiplash, here is what appears to be the situation:

1. Before July 2007, SAPPI said spending several million dollars to build a fishway at its Cumberland Mills Dam would put its Westbrook mill out of business.

2. After July 2007, SAPPI said removing the Cumberland Mills Dam would keep its Westbrook mill in business, even though removing the dam would cost as much or more than the cost of building the fishway it said would put its Westbrook mill out of business.

3. Today, in July 2008, SAPPI says that everything it has previously said on this topic during the past two years is balderdash and should not be believed.

We agree.

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Presumpscot River Secret Deal is Dead

It seems SAPPI has backed out of the secret deal with the State, FOPR, and American Rivers. We are not sure really why but we believe the deal did not seem so sweet to SAPPI. Reforming the riverbed to allow fish passage was more than SAPPI could bear.

We imagine that engaging in this deal has cost FOPR and their backer American Rivers considerable tens of thousands of dollars. It was a great waste.

Now it is back to square one with fishway proceedings at Cumberland Mills. Our motto is never make deals with SAPPI.

Sunday, June 8, 2008

The Fish Farmer

My comments of the FISH FARMER
This 1868 article-editorial in the New York Times is eerily related to todays struggle to restore the Presumpscot River fishery. In striking contrast, the fish leaders of 1868 said give us a few thousand dollars to build fishways and 5 years we will restore the salt water fishery(anadromous fishery). Lo and behold they did it. That is why Sebago Lake had the big salmon.
One would not believe the bovine skatology secret deal coming from the State DMR, United States Fish and Wildlife, American Rivers, Friends of the Presumpscot, and of course SAPPI that prevents salmon from free access over the dams and stops all fish migration at Dundee Dam which is the third dam below Sebago Lake. Even when the first alewives from the ocean bump their noses on the base of Dundee dam by the time stipulated in the agreement many of us will be old and senile or dead. The dam owners today must be laughing in their scotch every night at the failure of coherent thought of the environmentalists, the State officials sworn to protect the public trust of fish resources, and even the ocean fishermen who do not understand where those salt water fishes use to spawn.
email:

The Fish Farmer

"The World suspects the Fish Commissioners of the several States, now active in efforts to secure the cooperation necessary to the successful stocking of our streams, of sinister motives, and insinuates that the Convention in this City had for its purpose the promotion of private rather than public interests. As the Fish Commissioners of most of the the States serve without pay, and those of New York actually at their own expense, it can hardly be charged that they aim at draining the State Treasuries of large sums in the shape of salaries. The fact is that thus far the stocking of the streams of New -England has been in every instance done at the private expense of the zealous fish farmers whom the World imagines are to be most benefited by the success of the scheme. One of these fish farmers, who is also a Commissioner of this State, spent the whole of the last shad-spawning Season in stocking the Connecticut River, and not only paid his own expenses, but spent days and nights in patrolling the river , and watching his hatching box to prevent its destruction by the fishermen. Can the World imagine any noteworthy motive in this act? Among the fellow-Commissioners of this gentlemen, and included, we suppose, in the general acquisition of improper motives, is Hon. Horatio Seymour, late Democratic candidate for the Presidency, a gentlemen who, much as he may have been criticized for his political opinions and course, has never before been accused of dishonorable pecuniary motives.
The World betrays much ignorance in its attack on the Fish Commissioners. Does not the World that the culture of salt-water fish cannot possibly become a private enterprise in this country, where all streams of any magnitude are public property? The culture of fresh-water fish is properly a private enterprise, in which every farmer with a supply of water may engage., just as he would in raising poultry, and with even better success if conducted with the same intelligence. The culture of salt-water or sea-going fish must necessarily be done by the States which own the streams by which the fish ascend to their fresh-water spawning beds, and return to their natural salt-water feeding grounds. To raise fresh-water fish a certain process must be annually gone through with. To cultivate salt- water fish it is necessary only that the obstacles to their natural propagation shall be removed. This is what the Fish Commissioners propose to do, and they ask five years to do it in and a few thousand dollars to accomplish it with. The material improvements necessary are the fish-ways over the higher dams which now obstruct the migrations of the fish. The World thinks that owners of dams will not be induced to build these fishways because they are not disposed “to cut holes in the dams to let fish through, when the same holes prevent them from catching the supply of water needed for their mills.” The World is evidently under the impression that fish-ways are usually of a capacity to drain a river; or; perhaps that it imagines that the Fish Commissioners contemplate taking the bottom out of all the streams in the country. We have before warned the Fish Commissioners that it is against just such ignorance that they will have most difficulty in contending. Before they succeed they will not only have to compel manufacturers to improve their dams and punish illegal fishing by process of law, but also educate the World and such as read it to a proper appreciation of the importance of the material interest involved."
-New York Times December 3, 1868-

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Presumpscot , a salmon river

“The method of taking salmon is by trolling with a bright lure, with hooks or spinners and with natural bait, shiners being a captivating morsel, A good spring bait is the smelt. The fish when the ice goes out, are ravenously hungry and trolling is regarded as best. Later on flies are good, particularly when the heat is oppressive. One then should fish in deep water and in the rapids. This applies to all four rivers-Presumpscot, Sebec, Union, and Saint Croix. Usually the landlocked salmon takes the bait with a mad rush, and then the acrobatic performance is on. His first sign of fight is the leap, a similar stunt performed by the black bass."
New York Times March 8, 1910

Comment- It is 1910 and the Presumpscot is written of in the New York Times as a landlocked salmon river. We know that Presumpscot fishways existed in the early 1900's.
The North Gorham dam ,as it is presently, was not built yet. It could not have been a noted Salmon River unless the fishway was operable at the Sebago lake dam .
1910 however seems to be the end date for reports of very large salmon in great numbers.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Long Beach Sebago Lake High Water



Over the past two years FOSL has been photographing Long Beach after FOSL members residing there noticed an accelerated loss of beach. Fortunately this year winds were
diminished during the highest water episode. As one can see a 4 foot wave would be
damaging.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

FOSL Comments of EGGI and Normandeau Studies

Friends of Sebago Lake provides comments on two Fryeburg water studies which study the altered hydrologic flow impacts on Wards Brook Aquifer and Lovewell Pond caused by ground and spring water extraction by local uses and Poland Spring, a subsidiary of the Nestle Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Several Fryeburg citizens asked the Friends of Sebago Lake (FOSL) to review and comment on the conclusions of two Fryeburg environmental water studies; one by Emery and Garrett Groundwater Inc. 2005, and the second by Normandeau Associates, December, 2007. Friends of Sebago Lake has 18 years of experience with regulatory agencies and the environmental impacts of unnatural lake and river regulation. Many FOSL publications and letters can also be viewed on elibrary of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission website . The docket number is [p-2984].

Comments
The two studies EGGI (Wards Brook) and Normandeau Associates, Inc.
(Lovewell Pond) conclude the volume of water extraction from the Ward’s
Brook Aquifer has no significant impact to Lovewell Pond. Friends of
Sebago Lake believes that limnology, pertaining to the study of lakes,
is a very complicated science. Each lake is different and the impacts of altering the hydrologic flow will vary from lake to lake. There are many different variables that
would affect the impacts on Lovewell Pond of groundwater extraction in the
Lovewell Pond watershed such as water temperature, stratification, water level range, seasonal timing of lake water level fluctuations, precipitation, outlet and lake bathymetry, groundwater lake charge, evaporation volume, and lake inflow volumes. These variables are not addressed or receive insufficient discussion in the two studies. Friends of Sebago Lake believes these studies are inadequate for any meaningful conclusions either for determining safe volumes of groundwater extraction
or impacts to Lovewell Pond.

Several study factors or statements listed below create questions about
the accuracy of the EGGI and Normandeau conclusions.

* For precipitation amounts and timing of those events during the study
time period it was an atypical year.
* Missing data - A flow meter installed for collecting data at outlet of
Wards Brook failed to perform.
* The “no significant impact” statement in the EGGI conclusions refers to
volume of water ratio of Wards Brook flow to Saco river flood input and
the studies do not mention ecological impacts during low flow months of summer.
* Neither the EGGI or Normandeau study addresses impacts of temperature
changes in Lovewell Pond due to reduced Wards Brook flow and groundwater charge.
* Neither EGGI nor the Normandeau study addresses increased summer
stagnation in Ward’s brook outlet and Lovewell Pond due to reduced
tributary flow especially in the shallower northern end.
* Not one lake scientist either from Maine DEP or Maine Geological
Services has stated publicly that the present level of groundwater
extraction would not significantly impact temperature of Lovewell Pond or
the stagnation rate during the low flow months of summer.
* The maps of the boundaries of the aquifer and flow in it are merely
guesses. Expensive test well studies are needed to determine accurate
details of the aquifer and groundwater flow to Lovewell Pond.
* Normandeau conclusions supporting insignificant impact of groundwater
extraction are based on the misunderstanding between EGGI and Maine DEP .

Discussion

A significant time frame of the study was from June 2006 to July
2007. Precipitation was “atypical”. Water flows were abnormally higher
during the summer and lower in the winter. Usually , it is the opposite
case where tributary flows are lower in the summer. Flow volume data
gathered during this time period would not provide any relevance for
groundwater extraction impact conclusions for Lovewell Pond. The study
fails to address temperature changes to Lovewell Pond. The Normandeau
study states the amount of water entering the lake from the river on an
annual basis is two and one half times the volume of the lake. This back
filling of the lake by the rising Saco River occurs typically in the
spring or sometimes in the late fall. This river water is significantly
higher in phosphorus nutrients than the groundwater that is extracted and
would have entered the pond according to the study. However, phosphorus
and other nutrients and biota relationships are very sensitive to even
small changes in water temperature of the preferred temperature range of a
species. The more phosphorus the more important temperature is to the ratio
of biomass production. As the water temperature rises there can be an
exponential rise in biological activity. The study emphasizes the high
phosphorus content of the river water. Normandeau goes into considerable
detail on formulating phosphorus contributions for Ward’s brook and the Saco.
However, the Normandeau study does not address the stagnation of Lovewell
Pond water in the drier summer and early fall months when the Pond is
mostly dependent on water inflow from spring seeps and Wards Brook to
mitigate stagnation and maintain a lower water temperature. Even a couple
of degrees of temperature rise can greatly impact biological activity and
phosphorus transfer. In a drought year the impact of water extraction
would have a more harmful impact. In a normal rainfall year the impact
would be less severe but could be highly significant. Friends of Sebago
Lake (FOSL) disagrees with the Normandeau support of the conclusion of the
2005 EGGI study. FOSL believes the EGGI study conclusions are flawed.
The EGGI study stated that the water withdrawals would have an insignificant
impact on Lovewell Pond. Since EGGI performed no studies on Lovewell Pond it was unscientific and improper for EGGI to formulate this conclusion. According to their report, the EGGI staff received input on Lovewell Pond from Gene Berghoffen of the
Planning Board, Howard Dearborn, Denny McNish of IF&W and Linda Bacon,
a lake biologist with the Maine DEP. Howard Dearborn has stated many times
in meetings and in newsletters that the withdrawals are damaging Lovewell
Pond. Gene Berghoffen was the planning board chairman during the study
period. Berghoffen’s present area of expertise is in the field of trucking
management systems. For EGGI to base their conclusion on the statements of
two local citizens would be unusual for a professional consulting firm.
From what FOSL can interpret there was a misunderstanding between EGGI
and Linda Bacon, a DEP lake biologist. FOSL believes Bacon did say to
EGGI that the amount of water extracted from the aquifer in relation to
the amount of water that annually enters the lake from the river is
insignificant. No evidence exists that EGGI ever discussed with Bacon the
impacts of spring water extraction on Lovewell Pond in the low flow warm
months of June, July, August and September when the only significant
inflow to Lovewell Pond is Ward’s Brook and spring seeps. This is a major
omission in the justification of the present extraction. It is very
disappointing that with all the resources and time that have been expended
for these two studies there is so much doubt of their scientific
correctness.

Roger Wheeler
Friends of Sebago Lake

Monday, May 12, 2008

Letter to FERC-Crooked River resident

FOSL comment: This letter was copied recently from FERC elibrary files.
FOSL has several submissions to FERC about this degradation which is a violation
of the Clean Water Act.


Comment of James O'Connor in Docket(s)/Project(s) P-2984-066

Submission Date: 5/8/2008

Re;
Eel Weir Hydro Project, FERC No. p-2984, correspondence with FERC.

Please note any and all relating to this project

IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE
SEBAGO LAKE LEVEL

We have had a tremendous amount of erosion on the Crooked River in NAPLES and
CASCO MAINE as a result of high water in the lake at the wrong times over the last decade. The crooked river can’t handle the spring runoff if the lake is at full
pond nor can it during a big rain event while at full pond. This is What happens
during a flood on the very long crooked river - irreversible environmental damage,
not only erosion but, uprooted trees, dead beavers, squirrels, chipmunks, mice, muskrats, nesting birds, frogs and waterfowl. Oxbows are 'cleaned out" of spring hatch. The salmon won’t run because the smelt won’t run. Trout won’t come
into turbid water (silt). Another important and hazardous impact to the environment is- pollutants washed down the river from the flood. Gas cans, oil, trash, any thing left on the ground gets into the water supply including raw sewage.

The crooked river is the largest tributary of Sebago Lake.

Jim O'Connor

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Tell it like it is from Gardiner

From Portland Press Herald

Maine Lake Watch of Gardiner, ME
May 8, 2008 4:16 PM
It is about time for enviromental organizations, Communities and the State to walk the walk instead of just talking the talk. They like to blame shoreowners for the millions and millions of tons of effluent running into our lakes because it make them a nice "smoke sceen" to cover up for industrial, state and municipal damage done to our lakes, rivers and streams.

These "enviro-mental" groups need to take a good look at the destruction of our resources that they cause...Like the horrendous erosion of the shores of our lakes caused by trying to fill these ponds to the brim for the pleasure of the few. Mother nature did not create these ponds for the use of cigarette boats, to keep marina operators happy. This exploitation of our resources by enviromental groups causes severe erosion, loss of wildlife habitat, wetland destruction.

We are glad to see that one of these groups is finally concerned about their tons of runoff and what they have done might help. Now they need to take a look at what they have done to the natural beaches at Sebago and take a very L O N G hard look!

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Donations are Encouraged


On your right, you can see our new PayPal donation button.

This means you can donate to Friends of Sebago Lake just by clicking on this button.

Friends of Sebago Lake is non-profit, charitable 501(c)(3) organization.

All donations to Friends of Sebago Lake are tax-deductible.

Thank you.

Monday, April 28, 2008

Oldest FOSL Sebago Lake beach photo



This photo dates to the 1902-1905 era. It is a photo of the beach at Sebago Lake Station where there is a controversial boat launch.

To clarify ownership Paul Hunt-PWD writes
"The District does not own or operate the boat launch. The District owns the land on either side and in fact under the boat launch but the town owns a 99-foot wide ROW at the end of which is the boat launch which was constructed and is owned and operated by the town. It would be more accurate to refer to it as the town of Standish boat launch."

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Bad Deal for the Presumpscot River


State of Maine says no fish passage at the Gambo Dam until 2036 -- or maybe, ever.


Below is the transcript of March 13, 2008 news story on Maine Public Radio by Murray Carpenter about the Presumpscot River disagreement over the "private" fish passage deal. Hear the MPR radio story here.
---
The Presumpscot River winds 25 miles from Sebago Lake to Casco Bay, but migratory fish have been blocked for most of the system for more than 100 years by a series of dams. Last June, state and federal regulators and representatives of American Rivers, Friends of the Presumpscot River and Sappi Fine Paper signed a so-called settlement framework agreement detailing when and where fish passage will be installed on five Presumpscot River dams.

But the deal is drawing fire. “It is a bad deal overall,” said Roger Wheeler, president of Friends of Sebago Lake. The lake's outlet flows into the Presumpscot, and he would like to see a restored biological connection to the Gulf of Maine. Wheeler says the deal does not go far enough and is frustrated that one of the dams would have no fish passage requirement whatsoever.

“It is not going to help the fish. It is not going to help restore the fishery and it ends any chance in the future of restoring the entire Presumpscot river all the way to Sebago Lake.”

The Cumberland Falls dam, the site of the Sappi mill in Westbrook, is the first obstacle fish encounter swimming up river from Casco Bay.

The deal calls for removing the dam by 2011, after that, fish passage would be phased in the next four Sappi owned dams upriver over the next three decades.

Doug Watts, a member of Friends of Sebago Lake, says the timeline for three of the dams in the agreement is absurdly slow.

“Those dams are only a ten minute drive apart and it is going to take until 2036 to get a fishway at the Gambo Dam. I am going to be dead or in a nursing home before fish can travel about ten miles from Westbrook up to the Gorham/Windham line”

And there is no requirement in the agreement for fish passage at the uppermost of Sappi’s five dams, the Dundee project.


Last spring, the State of Maine decided in secret that native fish will never be allowed to swim past the Dundee Falls Dam to Sebago Lake.


Watts says this is illegal and he points to the State’s precedent setting legal battle over these Presumpscot dams which tie fish passage to water quality standards.

Sappi fought the battle all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and lost in 2006.

The Friends of Sebago Lake are also concerned that the agreement was reached last summer without any public comment. When the group complained to the Department of Marine Resources, DMR invited them to a late February public meeting and agreed to accept written public comments for one week through last Friday.

But some conservationists say the agreement makes the best of a tough situation.

“This deal provides the best guaranteed way to return native fish to the Presumpscot.”

Attorney Sean Mahoney of the Consevation Law Foundation negotiated on behalf of American Rivers and Friends of the Presumpscot River.

He says the process was complicated because Cumberland Falls Dam is not a hydro project so conservationist had little leverage to push for fish passage and he does not think fish populations will have recovered enough to require passage at the Dundee Dam during the 50 year term of the agreement.

Sappi is pleased with this settlement according to a statement from a spokesperson and Sandi Cort who serves on the Board of Friends of the Presumpscot River says it will provide a boost for the river's fish.

It would open up the Little River which is the second largest tributary on the Presumpscot early on to fisheries restoration and then other tributaries also, as we move upriver.

Before being implemented it would need approval from the Board of Environmental Protection and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Friends of Sebago Lake say they will continue to fight for more and faster fish passage.

The Department of Marine Resources did not return calls by air-time.

For MPBN news, I am Murray Carpenter.


Friends of Sebago Lake thanks Maine Public Radio reporter Murray Carpenter for doing a fair and thorough job on this story.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Atlantic Salmon photo



43 inch salmon speared on spawning beds of Batchelder Brook, North Sebago in 1907. Historical sources indicate that 1907 was the last year many large salmon inhabitated Sebago Lake. Eel Weir dam was completed about this time. This ended fish passage at the outlet dam. It is high probable this large salmon was a sea run salmon.

Saturday, February 2, 2008

Presumpscot Sebago Fish Anthology

Presumpcot Fish Writings
An Anthology

note :This is the beginning of an anthology of writings that pertain to fish that once ascended the Presumpscot River. This anthology is a work in progress. It’s inspiration in the ongoing dicussions and court cases over restoring the fisheries of the Presumpscot River watershed. Friends of Sebago Lake believe total reconnection of anadramous fishes from the Atlantic Ocean to the farthest reaches of the Sebago Lake watershed of western Maine is good for the environment and good for Maine.

The Story of the Presumpscot. Pre 1700
Over three hundred years ago an early visitor to Maine described a river similar to the Presumpscot in which ”…. At a particular season of the year the fish….ascend in such great numbers that a person could fill fifty thousand barrels a day if he could endure the labor. They crowd upon one another to a depth of one foot. They are drawn out as if they are water”

Fishing in New Hampshire by Jack Noon p.30
" Though there are apparently no documents in existence that gives a sense of the numbers of salmon in the Piscataqua drainage during the early decades of white settlement, in 1717 Merchant Archibald MacPhaedris wrote an account of the salmon to be had "in our new plantations about 40 miles from this town" at "Casko." His enthusiasm for salmon -fishing possibilities might have mirrored the conditions on the Piscataqua a century earlier- before white settlers had commenced
fishing for salmon:

[U]pon ye sea side.... there is more salmon and all manner of fish than in any place in ye World...
The River that leads through ye land, where all your Shipping lays......, is full of Salmon, that in ye season you may take 1000 tuns here. [ A tun is a container holding 252 gallons.] They are sole [sold] for 20/ [(probably) shillings per] Barrell." 15"


Natheniel Hawthorne Diary 1825-1830
“On the way home from Frye’s Island, Mr. Ring caught a black spotted trout that was almost a whale. It weighed before it was cut open , eighteen and one half pounds” A few years later Hawthoren writes
“Acres of water were boiling with smelts and salmon but a boat lenghths away, and very ordinary and everyday fishermen werereeling in twelve to 18 pound fish.


Bridgton News Oct. 12, 1877
All accounts agree that the Sebago Salmon are running up Songo and Crooked River in unusual numbers, so plentiful in fact that one informant says when the gate is shut at Edes Falls , one can step in and pinch them with ones hands.....specimens attain weight of 18 to 20 pounds

‘Bridgton News May 23, 1879 8 to 10 boats find constant employment in Songo. Catch has exceeded those of former years. One gentleman had 9almon largest weighed 11 and one half pounds.

US Fish Comm. reports 1871 p.465
“About forty years ago fresh-water salmon were caught in great numbers in Sebago lake.
The Indians in earlier times speared them in immense quantities in autumn on the shoals below the outlet; the early colonists caught them by the cartload during the spawning period, but the thoughtlessness and carelessness of civilization have reduced then so much n number that they are now quite rare. Still, a few may be take with the minnow as they run up the rivers into the lake, and may then be taken with the fly. Some weighing thirteen and one half pounds have been taken with the minnow. Last summer one was caught of ten pound weight.

Bridgton News May 1877
Fishermen line the Songo.... Ten, eight to ten pounders is a good days catch.

New England Magazine- Early 1900’s, Charles Beane-Earliest Open Waters
“Go up to Sandy Beach or White’s Bridge in the fall spawning season and behold something worth going miles to see. Thousands of big salmon, some of themwould tip the beam at better than thirty pounds, some say fifty apiece, lying with their noses upstream, well with your reach....

New York Times Nov 8, 1907
“During the late fishing season at Sebago Lake , Maine. It was no common occurrence to catch a fifteen pound land locked salmon, and one weighed
as much as twenty two pounds and one half pound, which was the record catch of the year.

On Presumpscot Fishways.

Maine Fish Commissioner 1875
On success of fishway at Cumberland Mills- Mr Hammond,
“ I have supposed that your fishways were intended for fishes in the upper walks of life, such as salmon, trout,@c,@c, but I find our new fishway is used by the mudsills, the suckers, the chubs, the puts, even the lampreys.”


Maine Fish Commissioner 1875
“Our esteemed friend, Hon. George Warren,” has given us an admirably built fishway at Saccarrappa”

John Warren diary June 17, 1893
“Yesterday met the fish commissioner by appointment at Sebago Lake upper dam to view fishways and to see what could be done to better, at this point they concluded that the present fishway was entirely without merit of any consequencem and that a new one would have to be constructed in order to meet the requirements of the present commissioner” August 14, 1893 Mr Charles Slvester returned for the head yesterday, having finished the fishway.. Aug 18,1893. “ It is also distinctly understood that the fishway he builds will be acceptable to the fish commissioners. I am of the opinion that it will operative and work well at lt least much better that theold. Mr. Weston’s suggestion to the fishe commissioner is that Mr. Abner Batchelder be appointed fish warden having charge of the fishway and its surroundings , with view of having the law properly enforced, and to this I agree.”

On Poaching

Fish Commissioner Reports- 1894
“From time immemorial till within 6 years, the salmon have been speared and netted on theri breeding grounds and have dwindled to a former remnant of what they formerly were. “

Bridgton News- May 28, 1880 - ”May1- 10th is best for salmon run on Songo River. many of the fish taken on the river are said to bear unmistakeable evidence of spear thrusts known as the Crooked River Mark”

US Fish Comm. reports 1871 p.465
Others of much greater weight have been speared at night while in the act of spawning. the spear in the hand of the poacher has contributed more than any other cause to the scarcity of this fish. Two years ago two poachers speared in three nights in Songo River more than half a ton of salmon. No fish, however prolific can long stand such a drain as this upon its numbers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ON ALEWIVES

U.S. Fish Commissioner Reports- 1872-73 lix
"Like the shad, it ascends from the ocean in early spring into the fresh or brackish waters, and has the advantage of breeding in quiet ponds, instead of requiring a river for its development. In former times , and before the introduction of dams across the streams, this fish was very abundant along the coast, and supplied an important article of fooed to thepeopled , both fresha dn salted.
The Alewife,In many respects, is superior , in commercial and economical value, to the herring, being a much larger and sweeeter fish. and more like the true shad in this respect. Of all American fish none are so easily progated as the alewife; and waters from which it has been driven by the erection of impassable dams can be be fully restocked in the course of a few years, simply by transporting in sufficient numbers of the mature fish, taken at the mouth of the stream to a point above the dams, or placing them in ponds or lakes. Here they will spawn, and return to the sea after a short interval, making their way over any dams which carry any flow. The young alewives after a season descend, and return, if not prevented, at the end of their period of immaturity, to the place where they were spawned.
In addition to the value of the alewife as an article of food,it is of much service in ponds and rivers as nutriment for trout and salmon and other valuable fishes. The young derive their sustenance from minute crustaceans and other objects to diminutive for the larger fish, and in their great abundance are greedily devoured by other species around them. In waters inhabitated by pickeral and trout, these fish find in the young alewives sufficient food to prevent their preying upon each other. They are also, for the same reason, seviceable in ponds containing black bass.

It is in another still more important connection that we should consider the alewife. It is well known that within the last thirty or forty years the fisheries of cod, haddock and hake, along our coast, have measureably diminshed, and in some places ceased entirely. Enough may be taken for local consumption, but localities which formely furnished the material for an extensive commerce in dried fish have entirely abandoned. Various causes have been assigned for this codition of things, and , among others, the alleged diminution of sea hering. After a careful consideration of the subject, however, I am strongly inclined to believe that it is due to the diminution, and in many instances , to the extermination of the alewives.
As already remarked , before the construction of dams in the tidal rivers , the alewife was found in incredible numbers along our coast, probably not remaining far from shore, except when moving up into the fresh water,and, at any rate, spending a considerable interval off the mouths of the rivers either at the time of th their journey upward or on their return. The young too, after returning from the ocean, usually swarmed in the same localities, and thus furnished for the larger speciess a bait, such as is not suppleid at present by any other fish, the sea herring not accepted . we know that the alewife is particularly attractive as a bait to other fishes, especially for cod and mackeral. ....
The coincidence, at least , in the erection of the dams, and the enormous diminution in the number of alewives and the decadence of the in shore cod fishery, is certainly very remarkable. It is probable that, also, that the mackeral-fisheries have suffered in the same way, as these fish find in the young menhaden and alewives an attractive bait..
The same remarks as to the agency of the alewife in attracting the deep sea fishes to the shores, and especially near the mouths of rivers, apply in a proportional degree to shad and salmon."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Relationship of Anadramous Fishes and Land Nutrient Interchange


Size of trees recorded in colonial times


1770 Dartmouth College 270 white Pine butt to top

1817 Lancaster, New Hampshire white pine 264 feet

1736 Dunstable white pine tall and strait 7 feet 8 inches in diameter at butt end.

Statistics from Fishing in New Hampshire by Jack Noon p.21

There was a direct relationship between the size of the trees and the amount of nutrients which were brought from the ocean to inland waters by fish migrations.

“A study of Alaskan salmon on the Kenai Peninsula trace a “stable isotope signature” of nitrogen from the spawning salmon. The study found the isotope showed up in the needles of white spruce in a manner “inversely proportionately to the distance from the salmon spawning streams” and correlated this with radio ollared bears. -- the delivery system.
The relevance of this study to new Hampshire, without brown bears, lies in the principle. All anadramous fish that died inland during spawning season added their ocean accumulated nutrients to the ecosystem. generally speaking” Jack Noon p.24

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries Reports

The following are transcriptions from the early U.S. Fish Commissioner's Reports
about Atlantic salmon and other fish. The information greatly bolsters our resolve to
reconnect Sebago Lake with the ocean. Friends of Sebago Lake would gratefully accept and post any pertinent or interesting information about Atlantic Salmon and Sebago Salmon history or related anadramous fishes. We can be contacted at email: friendsofsebago@yahoo.com
============================================================================

Material source is the NOAA Central Library Data Imaging Project

United Fish Commissioners reports 1871
p.57 Samuel Albro-”We get a half dollar a pound for salmon”.

p. 70 In 1819 I saw a school of menhaden out at sea, when I was going to Portland that was two miles wide and forty miles long.

p 218 “History of Hadley” Massachusetts by Sylvester Judd
the Shad and Salmon Fishery in New England, pp. 313-318

1872 p.22 “Of late the attention of the legislatures of the New England States has been called to this fact, and to the importance of restoring their fisheries, and a great deal has been already accomplished toward that end. Unfortunately, however, the lumbering interest in Maine, and the manufacturing in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, are so powerful as to render it extremely difficult to carry out any measures which in any way interfere with their convenience or profits; and not withstanding the passage of laws requiring the construction of fish-ways through the dams, these have either been neglected all together , or are of such a character as not to answer their purpose. The reform, therefore, however imperatively required, has been very slow in its progress, and, many years will probably elapse before efficient measures will be taken to remedy the evils referred to.

It would , therefore , appear that while the river-fisheries have been depreciated or destroyed by means of dams or by exhaustive fishing , the cod-fish have disappeared in equal ratio. This is not, however, for the same reason, as they are taken only with the line, at a rate more than compensated by the natural fecundity. I am well satisfied, however, that there is a relation of cause and effect between the present and past condition of the two series of fish; and in this I am supported by the opinion by the opinion of Capt. U. S. Treat, of Eastport, by whom, indeed, the idea was first suggested to me. Captain Treat is a successful fisherman, and dealer in fish on a very large scale, and at the same time a gentleman of very great intelligence and knowledge of the many details connected with the natural history of our coast-fishes, in this respect worthily representing Captain Atwood, of Provincetown. It is to Captain Treat that we owe many experiments on the reproduction of a;alewives in ponds, and the possibility of keeping salmon in freshwater for a period of years.”



p.22” the general conclusions which have been reached as the result of repeated conversations with Captain Treat and other fishermen on the coast incline me to believe that the reduction in the cod and other fisheries, so as to become practically a failure , is due,
to the decrease off our coast in the quantity, primarily of alewives; and, secondarily, of shad and salmon, more than to any other cause. It is well known to the old residents of Eastport that from thirty to fifty years ago cod could be taken in abundance in Passamaquoddy Bay and off Eastport, where only stragglers are now caught. The same is the case at the mouth of the Penobscot River and other points along the coast, where once the fish came close in to the shore, and were readily captured with the hook throughout the greater part of the year. That period was before the multiplication of mill dams, cutting off the ascent of the alewives shad, and salmon, especially the former.


U.S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries
Report of the Commissioner for 1872 and 1873


p.81
Certain bodies of water in Maine, especially the upper lakes of the Saint Crook, Reed’s Pond, are inhabited by a variety of the salmon in general habits and appearance closely resembling the true sea-salmon but differing in size. Their average weight in most of the localities mentioned is from 2 to 4 or 5 pounds, sometimes, however, being taken weighing form 10 t 15 pounds . The Sebago Fish is , however, much larger, the mature fish weighing 6 to 8 pounds. A similar fish occurs also in the lakes of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.


p.465

“About forty years ago fresh-water salmon were caught in great numbers in Sebago lake.
The Indians in earlier times speared them in immense quantities in autumn on the shoals below the outlet; the early colonists caught them by the cartload during the spawning period, but the thoughtlessness and carelessness of civilization have reduced then so much n number that they are now quite rare. Still, a few may be take with the minnow as they run up the rivers into the lake, and may then be taken with the fly. Some weighing thirteen and one half pounds have been taken with the minnow. Last summer one was caught of ten pound weight. Others of much greater weight have been speared at night while in the act of spawning. the spear in the hand of the poacher has contributed more than any other cause to the scarcity of this fish. Two years ago two poachers speared in three nights in Songo River more than half a ton of salmon. No fish, however prolific can long stand such a drain as this upon its numbers. A little protection and care in artificial breeding would make this lake with its connecting streams, one of the most delightful places of resort for the angler in the world. Down below the outlet the water of the lake, which is of the purest quality, rushes swiftly down and over primitive ledges, and forms magnificent pools and eddies , which are the favorite resorts of trout and salmon. One bright morning last June found me rod in hand and casting the fly at the locality above mentioned, but it was too early in the season, and the gaudy insects failed to attract even a glance from the lurking fish. I substituted a minnow, and trolled him across the boiling eddies below.
A whirl in the foam, a splash of spray, and a strong tug at the line told the story. The hum of the reel as the line swiftly spun out indicated a large fish. Checking his speed for a moment , I could see his sides of silver and pearl glistening in the distant waters below. Alas for human expectation! The log on which I stood, swayed by the current, caused me to lose my balance for a moment. The line slackened for an instant and the salmon, relieved of the constant strain, disengaged himself quick as a flash, and was off in a moment to a safe retreat.
My companion, however, was more fortunate, and landed a two pound fish. The first glance at this fish indicated a distinct variety from the salmon form the Schoodic and other lakes; for its sides were very much spotted, even below the lateral line, and some of the deep spots were underlaid with deep crimson, which appeared in rich contrast with the black and pearl of the sides; the dorsal fin was also very much checked with large and distinct black spots. It would remind the angler of the Salmo trutta marina and (h)ucho trout of Europe, so distinctly marked was the dorsal fin. But the examination of five other specimens at a later day proved that the spots were not constant; for notone of the five exhibited more spots that the fish of the Schoodic and some of them not so many. The appearance of the dorsal fin was also much changed, and in some fish the spots had quite disappeared which leads me to believe that the excess spots is due to food and locality.”

p.468........
p.469

Bangor, me. September 11,1872

Dear Professor: yours of the 4th is at hand. the number of Lippincotts Magazine containing my article on the salmon is May, 1869.

Since I wrote this article, I have satisfied myself that the non-migratory salmon have been seen in Schoodic, Penobscot, and Union ‘River waters only since forty years/ Concerning the Sebago Salmon, I am not so positive, but am quite sure the variety is not one hundred years old, or since the erection of impassable dams on it s outlet. The Schoodic salmon are about forty years old , and the old Indian hunters have given me the precise time of their appearance and disappearance of the migratory salmon, which coincides with the erection of impassable dams.
Migratory salmon of large size were at that time speared on the same grounds where the small salmon are now taken in great numbers, and which are never over five pounds in weight.
I have published but one other paper on the Salmonida, that on the togue, which is printed in the Maine Geological Reports of Hitchcock’s survey, and I have no doubt but that the description is correct and the fish new to the scientific world. The Salmo Gloveri is nothing but a parr. I examined the fish several years before Girard saw his specimen, and recognized it as the young of the migratory salmon. They have disappeared from the Union River since the extinction of the salmon.
Yours , Truly,
A.C. Hamlin,


Atkins, Charles G. The river fisheries of Maine. Report on the Fisheries and Fishery Industries of the United States sec vm vol 1 pp673-728

Broadhead, J. M Upon the abundance of fish on the New England Coast in former times Report for 1871-72 1,pp 169-170 1873 (Out of Print)

p.20 US FISH report 1906

p.20
Cumberland County 110 pounds salmon commercially caught Cumberland County value $19

p. 588 NOAA p. 536

“The most formidable and indeed insuperable obstacle to the ascent of the salmon were the innumerable dams constructed on almost all the streams near their mouths. These were usually of perpendicular height
so great as to utterly repel the attempts of the fish to overcome them.
This cause of the disappearance of the salmon is so paramount and obvious that the discussion of any other would be superfluous were it not that it seems appropriate in a paper like this to present every possible view of the question before us, and for the very conclusive reason that several streams , of which the Au Sable river is a striking instance, that have equally suffered with the others from the abandonment of the salmon, have never impeded the run of the fish by dams or any other artificial obstruction. Had the advent of the salmon in the rivers been coincident with the season of high water, their ascent of these impediments would have been immensely facilitated, but their run was was precisely at the usual occurance of the lowest flow of the streams. The volume of water was almost totally exhausted by the flumes, and at times scarcely trickling over the apron of the dam, without furnishing any supply to the slopes or slices constructed in accordance with the statute. the popular excitement became at length so deeply inflamed by acts which were then regarded as encroachment on public immunities that the grand jury of Clinton County, New York, were impelled, in the year 1819, to present an indictment against the proprietors of the dam erected at the mouth of the Saranac River in Plattsburg. The indictment, among other averments, alleged that previous to the erection of this dam “ salmon were accustomed to pass, and actually did pass, from Lake Champlain into
and up the Saranac River for a distance of twenty miles; 888 that before the dam was built salmon were seen above the site;”.” that salmon begin to ascend the river form the lake in June and July, but largely in August and September”. It appeared the dam was fourteen feet high, and the sluice-way forty feet long: and arranged at an angle of 30 degrees.
This indictment was vehemently pressed, and resulted in protracted and bitter trial in the circuit court. It was calculated to open a thorough investigation of the habits and movements of the salmon in connection with that particular stream . A great mass of the witnesses, embracing , embracing most of the early settlers then living, were introduced, and had the great volume of testimony taken on that occasion been preserved, we should now be in possession of all the essential facts and incidents necessary to form a history of the salmon fishery of that period and locality. Although the case was elaborately argued in the supreme court (Johnson’s reports, 17 page 195) both on the merits of the law, the decision which was in favor of the defendants, unfortunately rested on purely on legal and technical views, and we have but slight references to the facts in the report. We detect, however, faint glimmerings of the evidence in the arguments of counsel. It seems to have been in proof that the water in the sluice-way was too shallow to admit the passage of fish.
It is worthy of remark that one point of Mr. Walworth, the future eminent chancellor, as counsel for the defense, and evidently based on some features of the testimony, was that “no fish visit the lake from the ocean; the salmon ascend from the lake, and are fresh water fish”
And it appears from a point made by the opposing counsel that “the evidence in the case is that salmon abounded at the foot of the dam, and would ascend the river if not hindered by that obstacle”.
We may perhaps appropriately refer, as a subordinate cause of these results, to the depredations of other fish upon the salmon by assailing them on their spawning grounds, destroying the ova, killing the young fish on their passage to the sea, and frightening the salmon from their usual haunts. this cause, of course, always existed, but circumstances might have stimulated its development.
These changes in the physical condition of the region seem adequate to producing the abandonment by the salmon of the Champlain waters, but they were entirely local. The eccentric and capricious nature of all fish, which produces many strange phases in their movement, and from the general operation of which the salmon is not exempt, may be a possible cause of their disappearance from these waters. The idea is probably fanciful; but as my purpose is to unfold the whole subject, it may not be unworthy of a moment’s inquiry. Is it wholly improbable that the abandonment of the Champlain waters by the salmon may be due to their finding more genial resorts and fresh and more attractive feeding ground? I will venture to present a few facts in support of this suggestion. During my long residence on the borders of Lake Champlain, I have observed that a particular kind of fish will occasionally, through several successive seasons , be very abundant; that the supply gradually will diminsh, until, in the end, they nearly disappear, while another variety becomes predominate., rapidly increases as the first decreases, and they also pass through the same changes. The smelt, a marine fish, was, until, a comparatively recent period, almost unknown to the fisherman of the lake; but in late years it is often taken in vast quantities through the ice, while in some seasons it is rarely seen. Such, also, has been largely the history of a choice fish known in the region as the lake-shad.

3. traits of the Salmon

p.538

The perinacity of the salmon in renewing, after repeated failures, their attempts to leap up fall too high for their powers,
and the vast muscular force they exhibited, was witnessed by the settlers with equal wonder and admiration. I do not know that the myth, which once prevailed in the popular faith of New England and Scotland, that the salmon taking the tail in its mouth formed a wheel and thus rolled up the cascade, ever obtained in this region; but the stories of the pioneers and old fishermen were almost equally marvelous. The fish ascended the precipice by the mere exertion of physical strength; but the method which they adopted to secure a safe descent reveals a wonderful instinct or a rare exercise of sagnacity and intelligence. They were accustomed, it is related, to approach very near the verge of a fall, and instead of allowing themselves to be precipitated headlong or rolled sideways down the current, with the imminent peril of being dahed upon the rocks below or drowned, they would deliberately turn their tails toward the cascade and by the vigorous action of their fins and motion of their bodies would maintain their position and be borne safely down the obstacle.
The progress of the salmon in their annual migration from the sea to the tributaries of the lake seems to have been singularly slow and methodical.
Instead of diffusing themselves at once promiscuously throughout the lake, the advance from the north was apparently controlled by a system or some law of instinct. the old fishermen all concur in the recollection that a considerable interval, varying in their statements form one week to a month, always occurred between the time of arrival in the Saranac and their appearance in the Au Sable, although the mouths of these streams are only separated by a space of about twelve miles. Incidents in the habits of the salmon, which came under my personal observation more than 50 years ago, expose some traits which possibly may be regarded in the measures in progress to rehabilitate the streams with these fish. A high bridge spanned the Saranac, near its mouth, in the village of Plattsburgh; a massive dam stood a few rods above, asi it did at the commencement of the century; on the west end of the dam, the statuatory trough or slope had been constructed , and on the opposite end was situated a large- mill,
which discharged a strong and impetuous volume of water through a race-way. I saw schools of salmon swimming below the bridge the bridge, and individuals speared from it at a height of fifteen or twenty feet. They seemed to wandering in confusion, ascended to the foot of the dam and returned, paying no attention to the sluice way, which was impracticable for their ascent from the slight supply of water that passed down the slope. They were constantly attracted to the raceway, and plunged into it as if its rushing current was congenial to their habots, or perhaps in vain hope of reaching by the channel their appropriate breeding grounds. A weir was built in this raceway, in which, during the season, salmon were daily captured.

p 93 US Fish Commissioner Reports 1871 part 1 NOAA 142
As early as 1719 the general assembly passed an enabling act empowering each town council “ to take care for the preservation of the fishery within their respective jurisdictions, and to remove all obstructions made in any rivers that may prejudice the inhabitants by stopping of fish from going up the stream.”